Sunday, 8 April, marked the beginning of a week long recognition of the importance of letting crime victims know of their rights within our criminal justice system. Many organizations, especially NOVA and other victim advocacy agencies, are doing special events to inform the public of the many services available to assist crime victims. Here in the Phoenix area, a local church, the Church of the Advent in Sun City West, is hosting an information session with members of the Arizona Attorney General’s Office. Attendees will hear about different types of scams which specifically target the elderly. The focus of this session on Saturday, 14 April (10 a.m. to noon) is to let potential targets know what they can do to minimize their chances of being victimized. Unfortunately, the reality of today’s world is that many elderly residents will be subjected to criminal behavior. The presentation will also include information on what to do in the event a person becomes a victim of criminal conduct.
Our criminal justice system is well served by a dedicated and passionate group of individuals who serve as victim advocates throughout our country and our military. Almost on a daily basis they see individuals at their lowest moments, many of whom have suffered severe physical and emotional trauma. Victim advocates often bear the brunt of the anger, the outrage, and sometimes a complete emotional breakdown as they figuratively walk with the victim through the process of prosecution, trial and conviction, sentencing, and hopefully, the start of the healing process. They do an extraordinary job for every victim they meet, oftentimes completely in the background. They’re so successful at working in the background that many members of our communities have little to no knowledge of what victim advocates do. Suffice to say that victim advocates are a special group of individuals, much deserving of our support and respect. I, for one, am extremely thankful that we have such a dedicated group of professionals who selflessly and tirelessly work to make crime victims whole again.
Communication
“…Tone deaf, unresponsive, and insensitive to the victims….”**
** Cited from the statement issued by the MSU Board of Trustees on the fourth day of victim impact statements during the sentencing hearing for Larry Nassar.
If ever a published statement was the epitome of being tone deaf and insensitive, this certainly qualifies. I credit the trustees for requesting a review by the Michigan Attorney General’s Office. But that credit is tempered by their recent statement of support for the current president, stating that President Simon should continue in office. That statement is, in my assessment, premature and misguided.
Perhaps a reminder of ethical leadership is needed. Free of charge, here is a quick review of this concept. Ethical leadership is guided by a profound respect for ethics (what we do when no one is looking), especially such ethical values and beliefs which protect the dignity and rights of individuals. That guiding principle and such concepts as honesty, trust, and consideration, form the foundation for quality leadership. President Simon might have been the right leader at some point but a hallmark of a leader is that when the proverbial stuff hits the fan, the one in charge takes the blame. She was in charge and the majority of this travesty happened on her watch. On that basis alone, she must step down. She can lament that she did not know what was going on but she had the ethical responsibility to know. When she found out, she had the responsibility to do whatever she could to insure that the victims were harmed no further. Her desire to remain in office cannot take precedence over the need for MSU to redress the harms done to the victims. The Board of Trustees should immediately issue a new statement, acknowledging that MSU needs a new direction, one which adheres to the values of ethical leadership. That statement should also acknowledge the impact on the victims. Perhaps the trustees could express the hope that they can work with the victims to develop and implement changes that will insure that such a travesty never again happens at MSU or any other institution.
It’s about the victims now. Let them know without a doubt that MSU is going to do take a new direction, one that is both ethical and moral.
A Season of Giving
A Reminder
CHANGE – Friend or foe?
I’ve been looking at any number of organizations which are currently undergoing change. Despite all the research, change is still seen as something very negative and implementing change remains a difficult mountain to climb. Why is that?
Let’s be honest. Change causes anxiety. Will I get to keep my job? Am I still a valued member of the organization?
There are any number of organizations which implement change smoothly, with little to no disruption to the productivity and job satisfaction. What do they do that works?
Probably the key thing is communication. When a change is being considered, leaders within the organization need to let the staff know what’s going on. Leaving it to the rumor mill is a surefire way to creating dissatisfaction. Ask the staff for their thoughts on how best to implement the change. Use the experience within the staff to quickly identify potential problem areas and have the staff work with management to develop realistic solutions to those problems should they develop.
Another key is making sure that the staff is provided with opportunities for training in the new way of doing things. This can help insure that the staff gets the training they need which prepares them for the new way of doing things, but it also sends an important message – they are considered valued assets to the organization. When downsizing has to occur, the organization can take a very positive step by insuring that resources and retraining are available to help people expand their skill sets and find employment in other areas. Simply letting folks go with the attitude of “don’t let the door hit you as you leave” paints the organization in a very negative light, one which is not easily countered. Word of mouth will insure that quality recruits will take a second look at an organization that doesn’t value its staff.
Change might not be our friend but we need to make sure we’re not turning it into an unbeatable foe, either.
Focus Our Attention
No politics here!
From what I heard, watched, and read, there appears to be a perception that a double standard is being used regarding some individuals. Whether it is or not is a moot point. What is crucial is the perception has apparently arisen and quite frankly, nothing is being done to address it. Here’s the problem for leaders within the community and business. If any sector – public or private – condones the development of a double standard by either actually creating it or remaining silent when a perception develops, we have problems. As leaders, we are held to a much higher standard and we must fulfill our responsibilities to be role models for ethical and quality leadership. When we hear or see a double standard situation we have an obligation to step in and say and do something to address it. If a business leader is allowed to engage in questionable conduct but a lower level manager or member of the staff is held accountable, how do we as leaders within our organization reconcile such treatment of individuals? Can we continue to portray ourselves as ethical leaders within our organization when we turn a blind eye and deaf ear to instances of different treatment for different people? Obviously, we cannot control what people think and what they will say to others. We can control the ethical environment within our organizations and make sure that people, no matter their title or position, are held to the same standards. By consistent and ethical conduct we can help set the standard for others to follow. Not only will this approach help make sure that a double standard does not arise, it may also help prevent such a perception.
A Pleasant Surprise
I recently experienced a problem with some computer hardware. A keyboard which was put into service in April suddenly had about ten keys which no longer had any markings on them. It was difficult to type quickly without having to constantly check where my fingers were. Frustration level – high. In mid July I wrote a letter to the CEO of Logitech, Mr. Darrell, explaining the situation and noting that I was disappointed in the durability of what is otherwise an excellent keyboard.
Now for the pleasant surprise – within a week I received an e-mail from a customer service representative who asked that I provide some additional information, including photos of the keyboard. A few days later I was informed that I would be receiving a new keyboard. The new equipment arrived this afternoon and it is a pleasure to type again. This surprise is all the more pleasant because a replacement was not my intent. As a matter of fact I had already purchased the replacement the same day I sent my letter but had not installed it as yet.
Mr. Darrell and his staff at Logitech appear to appreciate the importance of quality customer service and professionalism. It is gratifying to see that a positive approach was taken to resolving what is in the overall scheme of things a rather minor problem. I hope that there is a consistency between the quality of their customer service and the treatment of staff. Such consistency will insure that job related issues will be consistently and appropriately addressed with positive resolutions the likely outcome. A win/win for the organization.
Politics and Leadership
No, this is not political commentary! But I did get your attention, didn’t I.
Here we are, right in the middle of a political season that promises to be as nasty and partisan as any in recent history. How can you insure that arguments and partisan politics do not interfere with your organization? Look no further than the face in the mirror.
How are you conducting yourself in the midst of this? Are you constantly talking up one candidate over another? Are you dominating the discussions and not listening? Is this behavior any different from the way you usually act? If the answer to that last question is “no,” and if the election is already impacting the way your staff interacts with one another, don’t blame the rancor and bad morale on the politics swirling around us. You’ve been modeling this behavior long before the candidates for this year’s election were decided.
If, on the other hand, you have been modeling and encouraging an atmosphere of emotional correctness within your organization you already have the antidote to counter the rancor and partisan politics. Continue to model for your staff the importance of remaining respectful and civil in all your interpersonal activities. Encourage them to focus on the business at hand and to try to leave the politics for after work. Do you have policies in place on whether “electioneering” can occur during business hours? If not, consider whether you want to implement something that is both reasonable and easy to implement. The key is to remain focused on your organization’s goals and the well being of your employees. People should not be afraid to voice an opinion but neither should they force their opinions on others, especially during work hours. Contrary to popular belief, tolerance really is a two-way street.
A Paradigm Shift
In a recent chat, Jay Block (author of the bestselling, “5 Steps to Rapid Employment”) made the observation that a near record number of job openings had been reported in March. The problem is finding qualified individuals to fill those positions. He noted that companies and colleges need to take a more collaborative approach to insure that a skilled workforce is available to fill positions as they open. Job coaches have to know exactly what skills are needed so they can do a better job of coaching and advising their clients in identifying and mastering the skill sets needed. That’s where the new paradigm shift needs to come in. In my assessment, communities, companies, and colleges need to enter into effective partnerships. Companies can use the colleges to help insure that individuals are taught the necessary skills to be productive employees. Colleges can use the companies as sources of information on what skills are needed, and to help their students land well paying jobs. Communities need to support such collaborations because as companies relocate, communities need to be able to provide quality neighborhoods, public schools, and community services.
This partnership cannot be in name only, just because it looks good in a press release. The partnership has to be an active, collaborative one. Communities that fail to support such partnerships will lose out on having companies relocate to their area, thereby losing out on the revenue income as a result of new people moving into the community. Colleges will lose out on the chance to increase enrollments, and companies will lose out on having qualified workers readily available.
Now the challenge is to find community leaders, business leaders, and leaders within higher education willing to let go of the past and implement effective new approaches.